Talk:Judith Jarvis Thomson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, which collaborates on articles related to abortion, abortion law, the abortion debate, and the history of abortion. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Religious affiliation

An editor has recently identified Judith Jarvis Thomson as Jewish, based on a web site called www.adherents.com. Since this web site is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards, I propose that the change should be reverted. In any case, prominent listing of a subject's religious affiliation, for example in the opening sentence, is often criticized unless there is some clue in the body of the article that their choice of religion was important in their life. Such a fact that would have to be shown from reliable sources. If any of Judith Thomson's publications mentions Judaism, there would be a stronger case. Since adherents.com is not a suitable source, and Judaism is not mentioned anywhere else in the article, I believe that the assertion should be removed. In context, and if there is proper evidence, it might be restored, though preferably not in the opening sentence. EdJohnston (talk) 01:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I know Judith Thomson, and she is Jewish. I agree, though, that the affiliation is probably not relevant to the article, and definitely doesn't belong in the opening sentence.P.D. (talk) 03:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)