Talk:Judicial philosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
[edit] Origin of Terminology
Was judicial philosophy first used by George W. Bush? I ask this because I initially heard it used by President Bush in response to a reporter's question prior to the confirmation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts.Patchouli 08:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Judicial philosophy has been used for years to describe the leanings of all federal and some state court justices. Bush may have popularized the term in some regions, though, as judicial ideals are often mistakenly characterized as merely "Republican" or "Democrat" instead of addressing the method of Constitutional interpretation.Adamc714 14:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] SCOTUS
While it is true that SCOTUS justices are usually the ones labled with a judicial philosophy, many other federal justices are classified as well. Further, non justices can have a judicial philosophy but not an outlet to put their beliefs into action. Adamc714 15:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
all i want is just one wish....your ever ever after!.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.164.192.187 (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
