User talk:JRStutler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greetings! Cheers!

1 No Personal Attacks
2 June 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter
3 Your comment on my userpage
4 July 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter
5 August 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter
6 September 2007 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter
7 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hamilton college iowa.jpg
8 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter November 2007
9 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter December 2007
10 Kaplan University
11 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter January 2008
12 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008

[edit] No Personal Attacks

I'm sorry if I've upset you by removing beer-u links from the beer page. However, I think that your recent response is inappropriate. Calling me an arrogant bastard, big ass, and blithering idtiot is not acceptable behavior on wikipedia, even if these are clever references to beers; see No Personal Attacks. I don't really care that you said insulting things to me, but I think it's important for you to know that this sort of behavior is forbidden.

Also unacceptable is that you've ignored what's at issue in this debate, which is whether (a) your page is of sufficient quality to be in an external links section and (b) whether, even if it is, it should be determined by you whether it it. Recognize that one of the reasons for the Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest guidelines it to say "Hey, don't edit stuff in ways that are closely associated with your interests, because your interests may cause you a bias that you don't recognize." I really don't think that you're being very objective in decided to post beer-u on the beer page.—philosofool 16:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

You didn't upset me by removing the link. Your removal of the link was not the issue. Your insulting tone was. Apology accepted. My response was meant to be tongue-in-cheek, not a personal attack. Apology proffered. Moving on...

I understand the conflict of interest issue. As I said before, it would not have been an issue had it been approached with a lighter tone. If there were others besides you complaining, I'd have no problem with the removal. RDWHAHB averagejoe 16:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2007

[edit] Your comment on my userpage

Hey, noticed your message on my userpage, and sorry to say that I don't think I know you. Your message ("So, I'm guessing you were maybe at Griffiss at some point? and probably not a Mean Widdle Kid. Right on, Red! --averagejoe 14:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)") doesn't ring any bells with me. I was never at Griffiss, though I did live in Rome, and no one ever called me "Red." Sorry! If you want to drop a line back in future, feel free to do so on my talk page. MArcane 03:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

AH! That explains it! I was an AF brat, and my Dad was stationed at Griffiss, but we didnt live on base. I guess I'm indirectly referencing Red Skelton...though the quote was actually from MST3K, which was referencing Red Skelton. Complicated, eh? Anyway, we weren't stationed in Rome until '84, and we stayed there after the closure in '87 when the old man retired.MArcane 01:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2007--Christopher Tanner, CCC 19:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007 Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter August 2007

--Christopher Tanner, CCC 16:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007 WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter September 2007
--Christopher Tanner, CCC 15:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hamilton college iowa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hamilton college iowa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)