User talk:Jolenecassa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Paul Martin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Also take note of the three-revert rule. Thank you. -- Gridlock Joe 20:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Edits

You are adding what amounts to original research. Please see Wikipedia:Attribution. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

If you persist in adding original research, most of which has nothing to do with the article you are adding it to, then you will end up being blocked. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Bienvenido-a.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bienvenido-a.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Paul Martin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please also make note of WP:BLP and WP:OR, as has been mentioned above.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly violating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased contributions, feel free to do so after the block expires. -- No Guru 05:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE:Your email

I am going to reccomend that you carefully read all of the policy pages that are linked on this page (especially the ones about Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. When your block expires please edit in a fashion that respects Wikipedia's policy about neutrality and verifiability. Thanks. -- No Guru 18:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal analysis in Pierre Trudeau

Please don't add non-neutral material to Pierre Trudeau (or anywhere else). I see from the above interchanges that this was a problem in February, and that a number of editors have explained Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy to you. Encyclopedia articles are not an appropriate place for your opinion on, for example, Trudeau's religious stance. Bishonen | talk 21:17, 20 September 2007 (UTC).