User talk:Johngalt78
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] February 2008
Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Dizzle, Jim. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Blueboy96 04:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dizzle, Jim. Party!Talk to me! 04:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ah...you haven't heard of Jim Dizzle, and thus he must not exist. Have you checked the Monocle or the Tennessean? They're both reputable publications. I am not disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. I'm wondering what the point of your entire life is, oh you of 10000 deletions. You're like the Wilt Chamberlain of deletions, huh?
[edit] AfD nomination of Dizzle, Jim
An editor has nominated Dizzle, Jim, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dizzle, Jim and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
