User:John J. Bulten/Invites
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] "U.S. presidential elections"
Hi, As I see there are several editors who work on the articles about "the U.S. presidential elections". I wanted to join but I couldn't find any wikiproject or task force relates to this issue. I propose making at least a task force in Wikipedia:WikiProject United States. Please answer to this comment here--Seyyed(t-c) 10:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] United States presidential elections
[edit] Mike Huckabee Merge Proposal
Please comment on merging Mike Huckabee controversies into Mike Huckabee here [[1]] Jmegill (talk) 10:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul concerns an article you created, so I think it will be of interest to you. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul
An article that you have been involved in editing, Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Parental Consent Act
An article that you have been involved in editing, Parental Consent Act, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parental Consent Act. Thank you. Burzmali (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Cures Can Be Found Act of 2007
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cures Can Be Found Act of 2007, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cures Can Be Found Act of 2007. Thank you. Burzmali (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ron Paul
Would you mind leaving a comment on the main Ron Paul talk page, I am tryinmg to merge the criticism into the RP 2008 page. best,--Duchamps_comb MFA 01:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008
Think maybe you have some spare cycles to look at this page? Couple things:
- There may actually be more RP skeptics than supporters editing it now
- We're editing it pretty aggressively to cut down on redundancy and size. For instance, by the end of the week, I'm going to try to get the "debates" section down to 3 grafs, plus a subsection on the SC debate with Rudy.
- We're talking about merging stuff around into the "splinter" articles (for instance, moving Moneybomb coverage into Moneybomb
I'm pretty strongly anti-Paul, and I feel better about my edits when I know the opposing argument isn't giving me an inch, if that makes sense. =)
Lots of stuff on Talk:Ron Paul presidential campaign, 2008
--- tqbf 19:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Comment invited
As an occasional past editor at Template:United States presidential election, 2008,
your comment is invited at Template talk:United States presidential election, 2008#Revisited: Proposal on minimum standards for listing on template
-- Yellowdesk (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Straw polls
John, you've put a lot of work into this. Can I get your support in trimming irrelevancies? --Orange Mike | Talk 22:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm working on it. But of course we need consensus as to what constitutes irrelevancies. John J. Bulten (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Template discussion
As an occasional editor to the discussion at Template:United States presidential election, 2008 your input would be appreciated at Template talk:United States presidential election, 2008#Proposal: A return to the old standards. Thank you.--STX 04:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Your intended comment is desired on the topic. Cheers. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD G. Edward Griffin
An editor has nominated G. Edward Griffin, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Liberty Committee
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Liberty Committee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Happy First Day of Spring!
[edit] Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 21:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of American Sovereignty Restoration Act
An article that you have been involved in editing, American Sovereignty Restoration Act, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sovereignty Restoration Act. Thank you. Burzmali (talk) 14:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul
I have nominated Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legislation sponsored by Ron Paul (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 17:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Trevor Lyman
An article that you have been involved in editing, Trevor Lyman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Lyman. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Burzmali (talk) 01:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Request for your opinion
Please Vote For Change We Can Believe In Or Even No Change at Obama Article
- Requesting your final opinion on the Bill Ayers language
- You previously !voted (here) on what language to use at the Barack Obama page. We're trying to get a consensus now. Please take another look at how the discussion has progressed (especially here) and consider what option might make the best consensus, then !vote again at Talk:Barack Obama#Call the question after detailed discussion: Option 3 or not?. Please keep in mind the discussion has been long, so if you can accept what seems to be a likely option, please do. This is one of Wikipedia's most prominent articles. Thank you. Noroton (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

