Talk:John Kefalas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR): 
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- The lead does not follow WP:LEAD in that is does not highlight all the major points of Kefalas' life. You might want to expand on the last sentence in the "2008 campaign" section, as it seems to have come right out of left field.
- It is factually acturate, but there were some problems with citations. First, cite numbers 6 and 7 have the authors names in the wrong positions. You do not need to specify all those that have the formats "html" as that is the default. In the "Early career" section, it briefly states Kefalas did not pay his taxes throughout the '80s and '90s as a means of protest. In my view, everyone should pay taxes and I imagine that was a big issue that should be more prominently highlighted. Here's from the source that was provided: "Local Democrat and House District 52 candidate John Kefalas acknowledged Wednesday he has selectively avoided paying federal taxes throughout the years in protest of United States military action. The longtime social activist and war protester didn't pay federal income taxes through the 1980s and part of the 1990s, and continues to avoid his federal telephone excise tax."
- It does a good job portraying Kefalas' life, so it is broad in its coverage of the subject.
- It is relatively NPOV, except for the taxes point (see above).
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by a main image that is properly licensed.
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 20:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your compliance and good work. I am promoting this article to GA status. Happyme22 (talk) 22:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Uncategorized good articles | Biography articles with listas parameter | Biography articles of living people | Politics and government work group articles | GA-Class biography (politics and government) articles | Mid-priority biography (politics and government) articles | Old requests for Biography peer review | GA-Class biography articles

