Talk:John F. Hall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Notability concern
Appears to be based on original research—no sources mentioned. Notability not established per guidelines. -SESmith 22:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Give 'em some time to evolve. Its lack of sources doesn't mean it's a lie, just that the first guy left them out out of laziness. Yes, that's a problem, but the article seems to have had enough edits per unit time that there's good reason to believe someone will correct his on its own. I'm lazy, too, but have known John Hall's work. He's notable the way any professor can be notable--they don't ever get famous for their work, barring Tom Lehrer and a few Nobel laureates. --Mrcolj 22:19, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- I know googleability is not valid per wikirules, but he's pretty googleable. He's pretty amazon-able, too. --Mrcolj 20:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
For a "notable" professor, the bibliography is a bit scant. Perhaps there are two decades' worth of articles and books that have yet to be posted. Is this New Testament translation project significant enough to really add scholarly weight? Someone with some knowledge of this project should elaborate. Otherwise, a few articles twenty years ago and organizing a museum exhibit seems like a rather low bar.Ibnalhamar (talk) 07:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

