User talk:Joegoodbud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Joegoodbud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair 06:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shadows of the Mind

I have noticed that you have added large chunks of text from here, under GFDL (I assume you are Philip Dorrell?). My concern is that this text has a definite point-of-view in stating facts, arguments and criticisms. Wikipedia is very clear in its policies (specifically WP:NOR and WP:RS) that theories, arguments, ideas, etc., can only be included if they can be verified to have been published from a reliable source. When it comes to academic articles like this one it is especially the case. I was hoping for your opinion on the suitability of the text you have added to the article, considering what is stated in WP:NOR. Thanks. Remy B 05:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

I am still concerned that the text you added violates the WP:NOR policy on Wikipedia. I think it will have to be removed since it is sourced from a website that doesnt fall under WP:RS. I also think an article in the likes of Non-computational theory of mind (or an existing one that I am not aware of) would be a better place to place adequately sourced criticisms of the general argument Penrose makes, rather than in the article of one of his few books on the topic. By all means I want to see this topic fleshed out, but if it isnt properly sourced (ie. from a reputable publication/author) then there will be more perceived bias than perceived accuracy, and that isnt good for anyone. Remy B 11:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Cash (drug culture)

An editor has nominated Cash (drug culture), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cash (drug culture) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)