Talk:Joanna Southcott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, now in the public domain. |
 |
Joanna Southcott is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
WikiProject Anglicanism To-do:
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
Joanna Southcott (1750 - October 29, 1814), English religious fanatic, was horn at Gittisham in Devonshire.
Did the writer mean "born" or am I just ignorant of this usage of the word horn?
Very clever. The writer made a typo. It happens.
If Southcott had been more successful, we would not be permitted to use the word "fanatic" (try the link!), for lack of "NPOV." Wetman
We would not be permitted? Just who would stop us? In any event, I see that the lead in the main article now meets your quite reasonable objection.
I deleted the reference to "fanatic" in the lead. It is not NPOV and serves no purpose other than to remind us not to simply dump, uncritically, copyright-free material from the 1911 Brittanica into Wikipedia. Especially in articles about religion, it is good to remember that those 1911 EB people were good, solid members of the Church of England.User:Jeffmatt
[edit] Heh. 2004?
Quote: "Southcott prophecied that the Day of Judgement would come in the year 2004, and her followers state that if the contents of the box have not been studied beforehand, the world will have to meet it unprepared."
This seems a bit dated, considering that the year C.E. / A.D. is now nearly 2006. Probably at least needs to be rewritten in the past tense.
P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 00:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] I agree
How about, "Southcott prophecied that the Day of Judgement would come in the year 2004, and her followers stated that if the contents of the box had not been studied beforehand, the world would have to meet it unprepared.."
I'm afraid to change it, though. What happens if the world comes right after I do that? I'd feel guilty. Jeffmatt
[edit] A Tale Of Two Boxes... Which Needs To Be Detailed
The article contains the following statement: The efforts of the Society have so far been unsuccessful; Church of England officials, including the Rt. Rev. David Farmbrough, then (Bishop of Bedford) have commented that for them to take part in the opening would be to unnecessarily arouse public interest in the affair. This statement if true requires that the box which was opened in 1927 was not the real box and that the entire opening was a fraud. This would implicate the Bishop present at the 1927 opening in the fraud. This implication of one bishop by another would be a highly unusual event: it is not common that an official in an organization implicates another official in any kind of malfeasance. Could this actually have happened? The statement is unsourced. Hi There 06:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
