User talk:Jlwelsh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles I've been working on:

Contents

[edit] Citation template

<ref name = "Gaddis">[[John Lewis Gaddis]], ''Russia, the Soviet Union, and the United States'' An Interpretive History''. 1990, p. 57</ref>
<ref name = "Gaddis" />

cite book using isbn generator: http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/ Hires an editor 00:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles that need to be written

  • Donna Alverman
  • Michele Anstey
  • Geoff Bull
  • Anne Haas Dyson
  • Irene Fountas
  • Peter Freebody
  • Linda Gambrell
  • James Gee
  • Donald Graves - literacy, not military history
  • Margaret Hagood
  • Renee Hobbs
  • Michelle Knobel
  • Gunther Kress
  • Donald Leu
  • National Reading Conference
  • David Reinking
  • Nancy Nelson nee Nancy Spivey
  • Discourse synthesis
Make sure you read the WP:BLP, if you haven't already. For Donald Graves, you can put some kind of disambiguation like his middle initial, or something similar... You can also put this in the "requested articles queue."
Hires an editor 13:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
And another thing! Wikipedia:Notability (academics), since I'm guessing these are all professors of some sort. Hires an editor 14:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Jlwelsh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Deb 11:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Something you might be interested in

Wikipedia:WikiProject Murder Madness and Mayhem

Hires an editor (talk) 02:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alternate Points of View

You don't have to read to improve your knowledge. For some people it may work , but for some people it may not work to improve your knowledge.You shouldn't have to read to make you smarter. It's not a nessecity.

I agree with this point of view, but it doesn't belong in that article. You were right to delete it. Hires an editor (talk) 02:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)