User talk:Jirgrfdsfg9764

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

YO!

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/PeeJay2K3 (2) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. iridescent 23:50, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was supposed 2 get more warnings than 1. You is breaking da rules which is not cool."


Decline reason: "You don't get a minimum number of vandalisms. You have shown no desire to help the encyclopedia. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Vandalism only accounts do not need more than one warning. A quick look at your contributions shows the reasons for this block. Mww113 (talk) 23:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)