User talk:Jimmyflathead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I noticed that you didn't have a welcome on your page so...

Welcome!

Hello, Jimmyflathead, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --ImmortalGoddezz 21:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)


Jimmyflathead - In response to your post to my talk page - you are right that I singled you out on the kappa kappa gamma talk pages, that was probably unfair. There are others who have vandalized the page too - both deletion vandalism and trolls. However, I stand by my comment that most of the negative content on the page is merely there because you bullied folks with threats of adding negative content and through personal emails. I don't much care for the tone.

Furthermore, I can't understand the obsession. Why do you feel the need to add all this? Why Kappa? All the fraternity and sorority pages have ongoing vandalism, I just can't understand why you are so intent to contribute vandalism and negativity to ours. Just trying to correct what I perceive to be unfair bashing for no good reason. ppfleiger 05:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC) >> Thank you for the note. I had actually noticed the deletion vandalism myself, so I reverted it. regarding your comment on Nancy Haigwood:

"...would hope that you would be kind enough to Google "Nancy Haigwood AIDS" and see why I suggested adding her. She may not have a Wikipedia entry, but I believed that her accomplishments warranted inclusion..."

I have to say in general, I like the notable Kappa inclusion guidelines, if only that without something the list becomes long and pointless. I think the first two rules are very reasonable: Noteworty enough to have a wiki page (or famous enough to deserve a wiki page) and being an initiated member. The third point about having never given up membership is a little trickier. Perhaps instead of not including those who resigned their membership, maybe that should be noted just like honorary memberships are noted? I'm not sure what to say there - I think you have to draw a line somewhere about what it means to be notable and what it means to be a member. I agree with Nancy Haigwood's accomplishments being worthy of a mention. She's certainly quoted often as being a leading expert. But why not just create a wiki page for her or add her?