User talk:Jim Huggins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome!

Hi, Jim Huggins, Welcome to Wikipedia!


[edit]

Here are some tasks you can do:

I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.

Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Happy Wiki-ing. -- John Fader 18:43, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Waterfall model

Hi Jim!  :)

I noticed that you've posted on the discussion page for waterfall model in the past. There's recently been some (probably accurate) claims made there that the waterfall model article is biased (against the model), and that it's a bit low on content.

I've made an attempt to expand the article, add some arguments for the waterfall model and to clarify those arguments against. I'd really appreciate it if you could look over the article and suggest or make some improvements, because I don't trust myself to not make a mistake or to be editing all of this without bias. It would be great to have a professor of computer science making some sort of review.  ;)

Thanks. GeorgeBills 09:43, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks heaps for the review.  :)

GeorgeBills 04:34, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kettering University

Thank you for the input professor, your concerns have been addressed and changed. please let me know of any further improvements that you would like on the page. hopefully we can get this article up to par with most other university articles as well as provide a solid source of information on Kettering. Thank you for your time, Matthew Yeager 15:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree that the 'surrounding neighborhood' section should be removed... i just didnt want to do too much deletion in my previously large edit unless it violated policy. I would ask that if anyone is opposed to this please discuss this issue now, otherwise it'll be removed. much of that section can already be found in the flint, mi article under 'crime' and the other part of the section (in the KU article) is too ambiguous to contribute to the article. Matthew Yeager 19:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)