Talk:Jimmy Kudo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

Really..... ><

Jodie Starling doesnt know his identity, Akemi shouldn't be listed as she is dead in canon and movies should be regarded as non-canonical; besides after movie 6 Hiroki didn't exist anymore.

Jodie: Her-- and also some of her fellow agents'-- knowledge of Conan's identity is implicit; it's never been explicit.

Akemi: She knew that; it cannot be refuted. Whether she's dead is another matter; I would add a limiter to that effect.

Hiroki: 1. His death: see about Akemi above. 2. His canon status: I am a vocal opponent of putting Movie 6 as canon. But since this idea lacked cosensus, and prima facie evidence say it is so (if one tend not to analyse), so I would put his name here until there is such a cosensus.

Samuel Curtis 15:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

1 Cleanup
2 Voices
3 Change all reference toward localized names into the originals
4 Infobox
5 Plans to rewrite this article.
6 Split nomination

[edit] Cleanup

This article is tagged for cleanup, but what do you think what can we do for it?

add some pictures episode information, a wider range of character stats thet kind of thing do the same thing for rachel.

Agree. This article seems to made by a Shinichi/Conan x Haibara Ai pairing's lover. There's no much of Rachel/Ran information, despite her presence is important to Jimmy/Conan in the story. 125.163.15.134 12:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Its still important, its not like the series is a romance but their relationship seems to be "more then just friends" just because they're the only ones stuck as kids. They're close and there are some moments. Then again, its kind of the same for Ran and Shinichi. And obviously they both want it to be more. Kaidenshiba 22:00 Jan 8 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by KaidenShiba (talk • contribs) 04:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Voices

Does someone else do the dubs for conan in the movies? He sounds different for some reason KaidenShiba (talk 23:23 8 january (Central) —Preceding comment was added at 05:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Alison Retzloff is the voice actor for Conan in the American Verson. Jerry Jewell plays Jimmy and The Phantom Thief in the American Verson. The movies use the same voice actors as far as I know. -Prede (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Change all reference toward localized names into the originals

Seriously, I think it's unproper to use localized name of america version. I almost laughed out loud when reading the entire pages of this entry on wikipedia. 202.146.253.15 10:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

It is sorry that we cannot. We have not even get a conclusion on the naming conventions for DC/CC, and for that reason we have to stick with the CC names. See: Talk:Case Closed for some discussion on this topic-- and maybe you can make some contributions. Samuel Curtis 12:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

It's not just the US - Canadian and British versions use the same names! WhisperToMe 06:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

I agree. It takes me a couple of seconds to realize who Jimmy is. Even though I have all 58 volumes (of DC) in my possession. I will always think of Edogawa Conan and Shinichi Kudo first. I say we use the name the author intended. It's not like you can't pronounce it or anything, it's perfectly readable in english. Vae 17:08, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Unlike you guys, when I read the name Ran kind of forget that its Rachel. Its easier to read it with all the characters being in English. If you want the names in Japanese then just read the Japanese pages. Sorry guys. Then again, that's why the names are usually kept the same alexyasha 20:45, jan 8 2008, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.237.214.67 (talk) 04:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox

I think we should make an infobox for this article as well as any of the DC articles who don't. It will clear away clutter concerning voice actors, birthday, other personal information like that. A new picture without credits would be a plus also... - Jezebel Parks 04:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Plans to rewrite this article.

This article of course has not much a problem on itself (It is the highest-graded DC/CC-related article in English WP.), but I want to reorganize it to fit it in an chronological order, especially much of Jimmy's childhood have been revealed. I wonder if any would support this. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 12:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I have to disagree. There are A LOT of things wrong with this article. It is extremely messy, with an out-of-control trivia section that keeps getting bigger, completely disregarding the WP:Trivia guidelines. Not only that, but there is too much unneeded information within the article itself which I think needs to be deleted. As I said before, infoboxes would help with this. The only reason I have not done so myself is because I honestly don't know how to make them. If we take care of the above, along with grammar, the article would, in my opinion, be much MUCH better. Jezebel Parks 17:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what you are disagreeing at; I aim at organizing the current content better. Damn anons, they just aim at adding fancruft.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 01:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I must have misunderstoof the "has not much of a problem" part. But yes, the anons are annoying. Jezebel Parks 01:12, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I have started rewriting at User:Samuel Curtis/Jimmy Kudo; but is far from finished. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 19:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I have made a great deal of improvements in my temp article User:Samuel Curtis/Jimmy Kudo; even I agree that much have to be deisred, especially I'm not an expert on his relationship with Ai/Anita, but please comment on how I did so far.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 21:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Split nomination

I have some belief that the section on Conan's gadget's should be split in another section since if they are to be elaborated, even without risking falling into fancruft, it would be very long. Hence I nominate the section to be split to List of Conan Edogawa's gadgets. Opinions?--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 16:21, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

I agree, since there is already a "List of Inventions" in Agasa's page, I think we should combine both to make a new article -Thriceplus 16:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Agasa had more inventions (or attempted but failed ones) than the ones he gave Conan. For example, the rainbow fireworks that nearly killed Takagi-- even that invention should be considered a success since Agasa was beaten unconscious before he started the fireworks.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 18:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

In that case, why not call the article "List of Dr. Agasa's inventions"? That will encompass all of Conan's devices (since they are invented by Agasa) in addition to Agasa's own inventions. -Thriceplus 22:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Moved to List of Hiroshi Agasa's inventions.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 18:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)