Talk:Jim Detwiler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jim Detwiler was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: December 26, 2007

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Sports and games work group. College football WikiProject      (Rated Start-Class) College football Portal Jim Detwiler is part of WikiProject College football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Assessment Comments This article has been rated for quality but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

A fact from Jim Detwiler appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 3, 2007.

[edit] GA review

For the time being, I do not feel that the article meets the GA criteria. The text is short, stiff and uncompelling, althought it is extremely well-sourced for such a short article. There are also some vital things missing, such as his birthdate, which, to me, means it isn't comprehensive enough. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)