User talk:Jiffyunited

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of Babe raider

A tag has been placed on Babe raider requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FusionMix 00:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ballerina. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FusionMix 00:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ballerina. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 00:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of "Linnea skinnia dipper"

A page you created, Linnea skinnia dipper, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoygabsadds 00:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of "Polkas & dots memorial site"

A page you created, Polkas & dots memorial site, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoygabsadds 00:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Katie, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Katie was changed by Jiffyunited (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-10T21:39:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Linnea skinnia dipper

A tag has been placed on Linnea skinnia dipper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 00:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)