User talk:Jessas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Jessas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 07:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC) {{unblock|[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Collateral damage]]}} {{blockinfo | ip = [[Special:Contributions/63.150.149.226|63.150.149.226]] | admin = [[User:Kukini|Kukini]] | reason = repeated POV pushing post requests to stop }}
- IP address now blocked for anonymous users only. As long as you are logged in, you should be able to edit. Sorry for the inconvenience and happy editing! ➨ ЯEDVERS 09:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Refusenik (Soviet Union)
Hi, and welcome! FYI, I have removed the link you just added to this article. I felt it is unfair to many thousands of well-known people to make an example of a 1-line stub of someone not as notable. Hope you understand and don't take it personally. Cheers and happy editing. ←Humus sapiens ну? 08:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The page you created appears to be an advert
A tag has been placed on Voce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Retiono Virginian 16:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Gershon Weisenfeld
A tag has been placed on Gershon Weisenfeld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GtstrickyTalk or C 16:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you don't want to see this article deleted, you need to provide some verified information as to why this particular rabbi is noteworthy. See our rules on reliable source for more guidelines as to what constitutes verified information. As the article currently stands, it could be deleted at any moment. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

