Talk:Jeremy Waldron
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Removed the entire paragraph beginning: "However, despite his claiming to be a liberal, Waldron is anti-free speech." It's clearly not appropriate in tone or content for Wikipedia.
However, shouldn't the tone be rewritten, but the idea kept? If you read the article cited, Waldron clearly has problems with "free speech" as most people, and the US Supreme Court, define it. He clearly seeks restrictions on it in a British -style system, which American scholars have largely criticized.
Furthermore, the remaining content of the Ideas section of the article needs, at the least, citations for its characterization of the subject's views and writings. It also has the feel of a non-NPOV categorization.
Babaronwheels (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

