User talk:Jengod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Nonsense of Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image talk:Brazilian grasshopper.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE. Speedy delete tag

Hi,

I have no idea how my name was on that very odd speedy delete tag. I'm investigating. Apologies. --  Chzz  ►  06:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Upon investigation; it was an error on my part; whilst tryng new software for monitoring newly created pages, this page appeared; the software should not have brought up talk pages; it therefore appeared to me as an article containing the phrase "What a handsome devil! jengod (talk) 05:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)" (ie a new article with this, and nothing more)
As this appeared (incorrectly) to be a newly created article containing just this, I selected the option to speedily delete it under the 'nonsense' category.
This problem will not happen again, and I sincerely apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Given the nature of wikipedia, in which several new pages are posted every minute, and many of them are pure vandalism, I hope you will understand that some degree of automation in monitoring is necessary.
Unfortunately, your comment was the victim of a 'computer error' during this process.
Once again, sincere apologies; I fully agree, he is a very handsome devil.
--  Chzz  ►  07:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of The Glory of Christmas

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Glory of Christmas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Potatoswatter (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of The Glory of Christmas

I have nominated The Glory of Christmas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Glory of Christmas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Potatoswatter (talk) 14:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)