Talk:Jenny Geddes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Anglicanism
Jenny Geddes is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
{{Stub

auto=yes-Class}}

This article has been rated as Stub

auto=yes-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Jenny Geddes falls within the scope of WikiProject Calvinism, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Calvinism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Cuttie-stool

According to Silverwhistle, Jenny Geddes threw a "creepie-stool", not a "cuttie-stool". Kaldari 22:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Prebble agrees, and my dictionary defines that as a folding stool. ..dave souza, talk 10:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Churches and Covenants.

Correcting the errors and misconceptions about Scottish history in this encyclopedia is becoming a little like the labours of Hercules. Well, here we go again.

The Scottish Church at the outset of Charles' reign had a full EPISCOPALIAN structure, with bishops operating both at a parliamentary and a diocesan level. The form of service, however, was more free-form Calvinism, as opposed to the highly structured Anglican liturgy. It was Charles' intention to 'improve' the plain Scottish practice with a more formal system. The Prayer Book, which was to be part of this process, was compiled, on royal instuctions, by a panel of Scottish bishops. Laud had no hand in this. The National Covenant was drawn up to challenge liturgical innovations, introduced without consent or approval. It makes no mention of bishops. These gentlemen were finally ejected from the Church by the General Assembly, held in Glasgow in November 1638. From this point, and only from this point, the Church of Scotland became fully Presbyterian.

The reference to the Covenanters 'seizing the city of Aberdeen' is misleadingly out of place. Why would they seize a city already in Scotland? It was indeed taken from local royalist forces, but only after the outbreak of the First Bishops' War in 1639.

For a fuller discussion of this subject see 'Charles, Scots and Bishops' in the talk page of the English Civil War. Rcpaterson 01:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Translation

"Devil cause you severe pain and flatulent distention of your abdomen, false thief: dare you say the Mass in my ear?" is very humorously literal, but rather longwinded, and I suspect that the redoubtable Mrs. Geddes meant to say 'flatulent distention of your abdomen' but rather something far more succinct. So do you suppose that the translation could be done slightly more loosely to more reflect what she wanted to say? 70.16.8.52 04:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)