Talk:Jean Houston

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Contents 1 Biography assessment rating comment 2 This article has serious issues 3 Extremely biased article 4 This article ...

[edit] Biography assessment rating comment

WikiProject Biography Assessment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 00:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This article has serious issues

First and foremost, this article comes across very strongly as a defense of Ms. Houston. Secondly, it cites Wikipedia way too many times (in my opinion, this should not happen at all). Third, it keeps on using the first person. It also generally lacks professionalism.

I came to this article to find out how controversial she is. After reading it, I still have no idea. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.180.56.14 (talk) 05:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Extremely biased article

The article is unsupported and biased virtually throughout. Opinions such as American people are not ritually competent are uninformed at best and assume that being adept at rituals is a good thing, which is also open to debate. Lakejohnson 20:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakejohnson (talk • contribs) 20:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This article ...

... is a disaster. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)