User talk:Jazz81089

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jazz81089, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Db099221 16:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Boys Over Flowers

Hi there, I saw that you added a statement to the Boys Over Flowers/Hana Yori Dango article, that it was the best-selling shōjo manga in Japan -> do you have the source of this statement? A website, or a publication? If we could add the source as a reference, it would really be a valuable addition to the article. Thanks! Ninja neko 05:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I see. I'll look for them. Thanks. Jazz81089 00:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your sockpuppetry

is not really good move to resolve anything here. Here are all your history, and you appeared here to the specific one from 8 month break? Besides, Azukimonaka (talk · contribs) appeared at Pyrus pyrifolia article as well. The contribution history does not explain your appearance and editing.

  • 2008-06-05T19:06:45 (hist) (diff) Blade of the Phantom Master‎ (rv. This second series was firstly serialized in Japnese weekly magazine. So this is manga.) (top)
  • 2007-11-11T11:34:04 (hist) (diff) Pyrus pyrifolia‎
  • 2007-09-07T01:34:55 (hist) (diff) Boys Over Flowers‎
  • 2007-09-07T00:59:19 (hist) (diff) m Boys Over Flowers‎
  • 2007-09-07T00:58:14 (hist) (diff) m Boys Over Flowers‎
  • 2007-09-07T00:54:11 (hist) (diff) Boys Over Flowers‎ (→Trivia)
  • 2007-09-07T00:47:45 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jazz81089‎ (→Boys Over Flowers) (top)
  • 2007-09-06T02:54:07 (hist) (diff) User:Jazz81089‎ (←Created page with '{| style="float:right;" || {{User WP Anime}} |}') (top)
  • 2007-09-06T02:37:55 (hist) (diff) Boys Over Flowers‎ (→Trivia)
  • 2006-10-15T16:10:16 (hist) (diff) Sea of Japan‎ (rv)

I will not condone this disruption. --Appletrees (talk) 20:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Azukimonaka

You've been accused of using abusive sockpuppetry and being a sock of indefinitely banned user Azukimonaka (talk · contribs). You also violated 3RR rules (5RR in total). Regards. --Appletrees (talk) 00:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR

You're warned but violated the 3RR rule twice. I let you know of this for courtesy.--Appletrees (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I wasn't gaming wiki system. I only adjusted the item taking into account the views of Appletrees. This is eaqual to the EdJohnston's comment that "" This work, though published in Japan as manga, was created by a Korean author""[[1]][[2]]. But to my regaret, he didn't read correctly of my edit. And this edit was third edit of mine in this item, and not a 3RR. And I am not the IP's, and not a suckppetry, as you will be ascertainable. So I will wait your testification. Was it wrong?"

Decline reason: "As I said to Appletrees, I consider the block justified for edit warring if not the full 3RR. Let it expire and reflect on how you might avoid this situation in the future. —Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] The checkuser never declined your WP:SOCK case unlike your claim.

Since your edit number in 3 years is less 15, so the checkuser could not have enough information even though he looked into your account. Like your claim, if you're really no relation with the OCN anon, so technically you have not participate in any of the open discussion or RFC like common WP:DR method but did the same thing as the anon. The 8 month break and your deft timing does not make sense at all. However, you have a chance to express your insistence at the RFC of the page, so take a participate in it. I also left a note to manga project and Korean project page for equality. Still, WP:SSP and WP:ANI are remained if you ignore my suggestion again, so please show your willingness as to consensus and cooperation. Regards.--Appletrees (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Blade of the Phantom Master. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You keep breaching Wikipedia's No Personal Attack. Besides, please do not say things that never occurred. Your version of removing all manhwa has never been semi-consensu. Never. I do not consider it as you think so. Remember, I would not still forget your personal attack on me yesterday. So this is a combined warning with the one at the edit summary of 신암행어사. Please take a participation in the open discussion, why are you keep ignoring it? Besides, if you're not the OCN anon, there is only one answer, you may be related to 2channel, which is spooky to watch me again with the off-wiki forum. I know they move their forum to other place. Remember, the admin say my filing WP:RFCU is natural, given that your edit is identical. WP:DUCK is also likely.--Appletrees (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring

You have been previously blocked for edit warring on the article Blade of the Phantom Master. After the discussion at the administrator's noticeboard which you initiated, you should be quite clear that continued reversion of this article will lead to further blocks. You had no more authority to revert Appletrees than he had to revert you, and you have now done so twice since your last block. Reach consensus on the article's talk page. This is your only warning. If you continue to edit war on this article, you will be blocked for a longer period of time. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your warrning. I already wrote my thought on talk page. It is very simple one. There aren't any citation that manhwa was translated manga, and there is only manga version, and we know that manga version was firstly published, so it is a manga (version), and not manhwa. If anyone cite manhewa version and he cite that the version was firstly written, it should be called manhwa, I think. I wait them. Jazz81089 (talk) 14:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Voicing your thoughts on the article's talk page do not justify further reversion. Following discussion, you implement a consensus version. Doing otherwise is edit warring and will result in another block. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I see, thanks. I only want a citation for Appletrees' edit that the work was translated from manhwa version as WP:source says.Jazz81089 (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)