User talk:James5555

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, James5555, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Ghirla -трёп- 13:05, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:876944948.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:876944948.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander II of Russia

Hey, I think maybe there's been some misunderstanding. I don't think the box is a bad idea at all, I just think it needs to be cleaned up a bit. I also think it would be great if it was created as a template so its like all the other Royal Line boxes in the other articles like you pointed out. I noticed that you haven't been around Wikipedia long (under think account name at least), so if there's anything I can do to help with the format or explaining how to make it a template, just drop me a line. Thanks! .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 08:09, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Just want to add that I made a slightlymore detailed comment along the same same lines at Talk:Alexander II of Russia. I'm willing to help with fixing the code and all too, If you want me to. Circeus 02:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moving pages

Please never ever move articles without discussion first. Such moves are very ill-advised no matter how certain you are about how good are they, except very few non-controversial cases. Your move of the Russian empress article may spark fire. In any case, please do not ever do it. --Irpen 23:57, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


Please take Irpen's warning very seriously. That is unacceptable before the consensus is reached. I could block you for disruption in not Irpen arguing that the moves were in good faith and the consensus is almost reached. Please be careful next time, there is no harm in waiting a few more hours for the move but a lot of disruption if the consensus goes the other way and you have to move everything back. Alex Bakharev 03:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

James, I have reverted your move of Mary I of Scotland. This is a controversial page and you did not follow the correct procedure of requesting the move and waiting for consensus. Please don't do anything like this again. Deb 10:38, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moving Estrogen

Hi James. Unfortunately, I had to move the page back from Oestrogen for a number of reasons; 1) Estrogen is the more common spelling, esp. in medical literature (Oestrogen is the British spelling, it's also my native spelling of it), 2) there were already redirect pages from Oestrogen already, 3) ummm - you forgot to also move the talk page, 4) it broke a gazillion links which directly point to Estrogen (see here and 5) you should never unilaterally move a page like that without discussing it on the article's talk page first. It can cause a lot of mess, which can require an administrator to fix (this one did). I notice others have warned you about this before. Anyways - if you've any questions, just leave a note on my talk page - Alison ☺ 08:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] premature death

be more vigilant?. Please, sir, you be more vigilant. -- Thisis0 15:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)