User talk:James086/2008/Archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Re: Socratic Barnstar
Thank you for the recognition through the barnstar, it is much appreciated. The only one I had before that was given by a friend. KV(Talk) 12:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your intervention on my talk page
I appreciate it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Revert
No problem, just don't revert away anything important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
sorry!
i didn't know about that rule! i wont do it anymore. (I did mark about 20 articles though)
216.229.227.141 (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thanks
what kind of music do you like? you ever listen to me group?
216.229.227.141 (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia sucks dick
yes itdoes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.145.216 (talk) 06:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
james086 is a complete duece bag who loves the cock and balls biatch
hahahhahahahahahahahahahahaha fag!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!1!!!1
-
- Hey, I never knew James to be a bag of playing cards. You learn something new everyday. I was tempted to revert this for you James, but I thought the caliber of vandalism was kind of funny.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 06:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
nigga fuck you know what im sayin faggot ass geek hoe cakes
fuck cunt shit balls dick pussy skank fag cock boy cunty lips silly fag dicks are for chicks
why don't you like my post? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.213.51.100 (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Large Amounts of Vandalism
James, I'd revert this vandalism for you, but it doesn't seem like it's bothering you. And agreeing with Torchwood Who?, the playing card joke was slightly humorous. I'll leave them on your page for your viewing pleasure.
Oh yeah, one question though on AfDs. I've been looking into people who relist AfDs due to no consensus. Is there a script they just type in to relist everything or something? I'm used to Friendly XfDing everything such that I'm not exactly familiar with this particular one. Thanks. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
White Gold
I added the [citation needed] citation to the statement added by someone else? I fail to see how I was unconstructive? Matthew Glennon(Talk) 09:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Cooltunes
User:Cooltunes has requested an unblock. Could possibly be worth taking a look at. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. I'll put him/her on my watchlist. I'll be around for awhile today. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Why James Why?
I have very good points on everything I have written. I just don't understand why you are being so mean to me. (I still have three out there, and one is really good)
Happy Hunting:)
Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Maserati MC12
I was reading over your great work on the Maserati MC12 featured article, and I noticed it needs a bit of updating, at least for the MC12 GT1. Most everything seems to stop during the middle of the 2006 season, or at least I think it does. The final paragraph caught me off guard since it claims their drivers finished 5th and 7th, yet Bartels and Bertolini actually did win the 2006 championship. I assume when you wrote that, the team had merely won the teams championship and had yet to secure the drivers championship?
Anyway, I figured it'd be good to come to you before attempting to write not only about the 2007 FIA GT season, but also preperations for 2008 as well as what eventually happened to the Doran Maserati in ALMS. The source I had provided for that needs to be replaced as well since the-paddock.net has since shut down. The359 (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
More Maserati MC12
I'll try and offer what I can to the article, especially regarding 2007 and plans for 2008. Also, since I found some CC pictures on Flickr earlier today, I was wondering if you think that this picture might be better for tha article than the one already in use. It's the same team from the same season, but I think the first picture is much clearer, and is a nice 3/4th shot so you can see most all of the car. It also fills the picture more than the current picture. The359 (talk) 03:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
DragonHorse
I'm sorry, it's a well known fact they cannot play live. They had even admitted to it. Theyre a studio band. While most of what I did was vandalism, it is true that they cant play live. 74.12.218.22 (talk) 13:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- If you can provide a reliable source then you can add the information to the article. Something like "Dragonforce have been criticised for their live performances being out of time..." or something like that with a link to where somebody says it. Just adding your own opinion (along with "Dragonhorse") is not useful. James086Talk | Email 13:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Half the stuff on this site doesn't even have reliable sources, or links pointing to some evidence anyway. But sorry to have bothered you, I was bored and sick of hearing that they're "amazing"... By the way, would a youtube vid of them live count? 74.12.218.22 (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Not really because it doesn't actually have anyone saying that their performance was bad (some people might consider that performance good). If you could find a review of one of their shows or perhaps a review of a music festival that they performed at which has a quote that would be perfect. Yes a lot of the stuff on Wikipedia is without sources but it is slowly getting there. For example the number of Featured Articles is increasing at a rate greater than 1 per day and the sourcing in those must be excellent for them to pass. James086Talk | Email 13:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Half the stuff on this site doesn't even have reliable sources, or links pointing to some evidence anyway. But sorry to have bothered you, I was bored and sick of hearing that they're "amazing"... By the way, would a youtube vid of them live count? 74.12.218.22 (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
EastEnders revert?!
You reverted my edit to list of buildings in EastEnders - why? Its a valid edit. In the show, Getaway Motors has now changed back to Pats Cabs, so i moved it. 172.159.110.157 (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, I was incorrect in reverting you. All I saw was you removing the entire section and did not realise that the name had changed. My apologies. User:Loren.wilton also reverted for the same reason I'm sure. Sorry about that. James086Talk | Email 09:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Its ok. Thanks anyway. 172.159.110.157 (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Image tagging
As I said, the image is wrong. The fifth-place team(fourth-place of playoff) cannot gain a UEFA Cup ticket directly. It need to do some work. Raymond Giggs 11:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: Funny things
Thanks. I'm glad you enjoyed it, although, IMO, User:Thingg's is much better than mine.
Your diff was pretty funny, but after this, I have tried not to include potentially offensive things in my list. I hope you won't take offense for me not using your suggestion. Cheers! J.delanoygabsadds 16:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- Just wondering if you can help me with something. User:John celona has broken the 3RR multiple times.
- ([1], [2], [3], [4], this is a like 5RR violation)
- Although most are not within 24hrs, the "5RR" violation does include 3 reversions within 24hrs. He was only "officially" warned about the 3RR rule here. Should I hold off filing a report on WP:AN3 until such time as John re-breaks the 3RR? Should I go back through and re-undo his reversions? Thanks in advance for your help. J.delanoy
gabsadds 16:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
J.delanoygabsadds has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
China Ministry of state security page
Why have you deleted my table of weapons? I don't know how to format it again.
- Sorry about deleting the table, you removed some other content so it triggered an alert. I didn't realise I had also removed your good additions. I think that you've put it back, is it all restored? James086Talk | Email 01:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
AIV reporting
Hi James086, thanks for taking the time to explain the template problem on my talk page. I appreciate your going out of your way. I saw how you fixed it but wasn't sure what was causing the problem. See you around. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
My edit of you private page
I took the liberty of editing your private page, James086/Portal:Featured content, because the syntax for the template {{shortcut}} is in the process of being updated. Your implementation, which worked previously, broke the new syntax. You can find more information at CAT:SHORTFIX. Best wishes. --DRoll (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thank spam
Maserati MC12 updated
After much delay by, well, my own racing on the PS3, I've finally had a chance to take a stab at updating the MC12's racing history. Added several citations to the section on Doran's two races, as well as correcting some of the information on FIA GT in 2007 (mostly regarding JMB's entering the Citation Cup). Also have the list of drivers and teams for 2008. Feel free to change it as you feel necessary to better fit the article. The359 (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- Now that I think about it, I wonder if some mention should be made of the pre-season testing carried out by Maserati/Ferrari in preparing the GT1? Dailysportscar has lots of news archives from 2004 regarding the development of the MC12 as well as test drivers, modifications, teams, and the debate regarding the legality of the cars. The359 (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Adeyto
Can you please userfy this page, I found some sources but am unfamiliar with the previous content to know if I can improve the article or not. --I Write Stuff (talk) 12:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are right, with all of the present drama I think it is a bit naive of me to assume he would take it any other way and I should have taken Bigtime's advice. I db-self'd the article. If she is notable I am sure someone else over time will have it undeleted and work on it. Thank you for your assistance none-the-less and sorry for wasting your time. --I Write Stuff (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- hi James086, I was just hoping that more editors will have the chance to see that the Adeyto article wasn't a hoax and that it wasn't either spam nor selling anything but informative and verifiable. With your new deletion, an objective opinion won't be possible. May I remind you one of Wikipedia's basic rules: If an article currently does not cite reliable secondary sources, that does not necessarily mean that its topic is spam or advertisement or not notable. If the content currently isn't, can it be made so? If the topic isn't, can it be made so? For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort. Tsurugaoka (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- The problem I see is that the article mainly links back to Adeyto, and reads more like a list of every time the person appeared on TV, instead of starring roles which I could not find. Yes they are on IMDB, yes they have been in a lot of movies, but as extra's, not the star, which makes it a pain to formulate a serious article. There is also a lot of talk about doing a video for other people, but those people are not notable, or at least do not contain articles themselves on Wikipedia so we can state, ok they are a music video producer for the stars, like Hype Williams. --I Write Stuff (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)--I Write Stuff (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- There is something like culture difference between your (occidental?) way of classifying her works and our Japanese way. Yes she was main actress in a couple of Japanese dramas (for example when she played Marilyn Monroe) or in the film Silver Kamen that is the last art work of the recently deceased Jissoji Akio, a cult director in Japan. She had supportive, memorable or key roles in many of the dramas and films. Nevertheless it is almost impossible for a foreign actor to play the main character in a Japanese drama so even cameo appearences are quite respected. We here never consider that as -extra- especially not when actor's name appears on the credits.
- I do agree though that a mere list of roles isn't too useful for anyone outside Japan and it is true that the article needs elaborate information about the actual roles. I hope that this section will grow in time, myself included will research and add data. Tsurugaoka (talk) 11:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- The problem I see is that the article mainly links back to Adeyto, and reads more like a list of every time the person appeared on TV, instead of starring roles which I could not find. Yes they are on IMDB, yes they have been in a lot of movies, but as extra's, not the star, which makes it a pain to formulate a serious article. There is also a lot of talk about doing a video for other people, but those people are not notable, or at least do not contain articles themselves on Wikipedia so we can state, ok they are a music video producer for the stars, like Hype Williams. --I Write Stuff (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)--I Write Stuff (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- hi James086, I was just hoping that more editors will have the chance to see that the Adeyto article wasn't a hoax and that it wasn't either spam nor selling anything but informative and verifiable. With your new deletion, an objective opinion won't be possible. May I remind you one of Wikipedia's basic rules: If an article currently does not cite reliable secondary sources, that does not necessarily mean that its topic is spam or advertisement or not notable. If the content currently isn't, can it be made so? If the topic isn't, can it be made so? For articles of unclear notability, deletion should be a last resort. Tsurugaoka (talk) 14:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- It seems that the article will be restored anyway (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 April 30) so I will let that be the process of restoration. There were a lot of links to cafepress (a website aimed at selling calendars for Adeyto), definitely qualifying as spam links (not necessarily the whole article) and the notability wasn't clear. I'm not saying the initial deletion was correct, in fact I haven't even checked whether it was correct but my deletion was because the user requested that a subpage of theirs be deleted. The article can be restored to the mainspace like it would have been if I hadn't userfied it, if the admin closing the DRV doesn't know how to do this I can show them. James086Talk | Email 01:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please take a look at the article, it's now on my talk page. I happen to come across it when I_Write_Stuff had it on his page for few minutes. I searched like mad for the CafePress Calendar selling links and I couldn't find ANY. So I will politely beg the participants in this discussion to refrain from this accusation. I never saw those links in this artist's Wikipedia anyway. Yes there is one on artist's Official Site but that is absolutely standard and only a fool could blame them for that.
- It seems that the article will be restored anyway (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 April 30) so I will let that be the process of restoration. There were a lot of links to cafepress (a website aimed at selling calendars for Adeyto), definitely qualifying as spam links (not necessarily the whole article) and the notability wasn't clear. I'm not saying the initial deletion was correct, in fact I haven't even checked whether it was correct but my deletion was because the user requested that a subpage of theirs be deleted. The article can be restored to the mainspace like it would have been if I hadn't userfied it, if the admin closing the DRV doesn't know how to do this I can show them. James086Talk | Email 01:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- One last comment to the over-discussed pictures, they aren't simple pictures of that person, they all are artworks as in self-portraits and as far as I understood self-designed (costumes, paintings) therefore I support keeping as many as needed, just like we would keep Van Gogh's self-portrait on his Wikipedia article, please excuse my comparison and no need to attack me for this but I just want to make clear my idea. Thank you for understanding Tsurugaoka (talk) 11:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
why?
thanks for reverting that change to Nietzsche. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.64.134.212 (talk) 02:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I reverted because it was plainly vandalism. If you did not make the edit then you may be editing from a shared IP address (it's very common and nothing unusual) and the message may not have been intended for you. James086Talk | Email 02:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Chewbacca
why you dis chewy
chewy will eat your socks
- Your edit was plain silliness and Wikipedia is not just a playground. James086Talk | Email 02:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
ill vandalise —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.28.157.193 (talk) 02:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
was up
was up
IP Ban
I would like to know why you have banned my school's IP adress. I find it a pain to log in if I would like to edit a page. Vinni3 (talk) 14:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Well James, there is a problem with that. My school has an internet filter, and that makes life hard. Thanks for you help though! Vinni3 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
School IP address block
I have the IP address of our school: 193.164.114.4. I hope that you understand that I have taken action, and spoke to the Deputy Headteacher about this issue; rest assured that this will not be happening again. Vinni3 (talk) 10:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks James! Vinni3 (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Template:Pictures
I saw that Template:Pictures was deleted. Where's the "original" version of this. I've been searching and searching for it but could not find a template like Template:Pictures.
Can we get Template:Pictures back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flashpoint (talk • contribs)
Response to a revert
What's unconstructive about the truth Randi-boy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.49.224.70 (talk • contribs)
- Nothing, so why not start adding truthful information rather than attempting to disparage James Randi? James086Talk | Email 05:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
James Randi and truth. Sorry. That's like matter and anti-matter. But since we can't mass produce or yet mine anti-matter, and Randi will never be anywhere close to the truth, there will be no explosion. So his behind will still be there for you. Pucker up Randi-boy.
Vandal blocking thank you
Thank you for being around at (what for me amounts to) an odd hour and picking up on a needed block without my even asking. It's noticed and appreciated. Jclemens (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ditto. I get so sick & tired of vandals... Trekphiler (talk) 07:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Kaneohe, Hawaii
You spell Kaneohe K-a-n-e-o-h-e —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.227.95 (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I assume you are confused about the warning, in which case it was probably a shared IP address (quite common) and it was intended for someone else. Thanks, James086Talk | Email 12:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
wat
oi wat was vandlism about that bruz, i call it constructive input and it highlights the page in a special kind of context that you would not understand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.202.109 (talk) 12:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- If it were helpful content for inclusion in an encyclopedia then I would not have reverted. Saying that you consider it a waste of your time should not be included in an encyclopedia and it's pretty obvious so I reverted immediately. You could say that on a web forum or blog if you like but Wikipedia is niether of these. James086Talk | Email 12:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
but would you agree she is a waste of time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.202.109 (talk) 12:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know. It doesn't matter because you need to provide a reliable source to add info like that. James086Talk | Email 12:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Reaper episode list
To clarify: this is in regards to the edit you "undid" of mine which was undoing an edit. for reference your edit and his will be referred to edit A mine and the original edit B. A vandal (you can see his IP address) changed the page to include graphic words (read- genitalia). He/she also changed the finale episode summary to read three words repeated over. And the edit he made which i corrected and you reverted also included information that was false.
The episode hinted at that, but it was never explicitly said. meaning, it's not true. Once it airs, if it is true, feel free to change it if you so desire. However, putting anything like that would be considered spoiling(if it's true and it's put out there before the episode airs). The episode the vandal put it under was the past episode but like I said, it wasn't proven. Therefore it shouldn't be on wiki- after all this is supposed to be facts no?
That's fine. Sorry about that I go defensive- I thought you were upset about the other episode change :) where i took out some more of that :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolceruleanblue (talk • contribs) 07:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Johnny Damon
hey you deleted my johnny damon comment, that wasn't very nice!. :( :( :( :( :( :(
- Wikipedia is not the place for your personal opinion; it is an encyclopedia. If you want to publish your opinion why not get a blog? James086Talk | Email 13:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
September Dawn
Hi! Your a total flamer why would you say that my edit wasn't constructive. I do believe that my point that it was a terrible movie is very credible just watch it, terrible. Christopher Cain should give up directing and you know it nobody even knows he exists. try to find his wiki page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pol pot hates hitler (talk • contribs) 13:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It should not include the personal opinion of people who haven't had that opinion published by a reliable source. That would mean a film review or magazine article. Also asking rhetorical questions is not encyclopedic so should not be included either. James086Talk | Email 13:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
you are the biggest flaming faggit on the internet i didn't vandalize anything you homo. i just stated a fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pol pot hates hitler (talk • contribs) 13:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Please block an IP
Can to perma-block this IP? (193.164.114.4) For I know, it's not my school, and it could be another school sharing the same IP as us. Cheers. --Vinni3 (talk) 07:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Yeah, cheers for that snippet of info. --Vinni3 (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:50, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
| Weekly Delivery |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

