From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
What makes him notable? --euyyn 18:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Any US federal judge is technically notable (some obviously more than others), but Robertson decided the major case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, making him part of an historic Supreme Court decision. --Dhartung | Talk 00:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- And why exactly is any US federal judge technically notable? I hope you aren't suggesting that being an US federal judge makes anyone automatically notable (in wikipedia's sense, of curse). (Although I don't really know: maybe federal judges in the US appear regularly on TV or something).
- Concerning this guy, if his notability is mainly due to the case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (which I don't know if it can be historic yet, but is certainly notable), it should be mentioned in the introductory paragraph of the article, so readers doesn't make themselves the question about his notability I did. If you agree, I'll add it to the article when I get time. --euyyn 23:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
