Talk:James Eade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Chess Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-Importance on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

[edit] Old talk

This entire section should be rewritten or removed entirely, as it looks biaised and has a motivation that is questionable, particularly the part regarding 'enemies':

Quote:

'Politically, he is a controversial person, primarily because he is a close friend and political ally of Tom Dorsch. The two of them took on the US chess establishment by claiming that the USCF was being mismanaged and misgoverned into insolvency. Although later developments vindicated them, they made numerous enemies along the way. Eade was one of three Northern Californians (with Mark Pinto, and Neil Falconer) to bail the USCF out when it could not afford to send a team to the Olympiads.'

[edit] Double article?

It seems that this article has two sections dealing with the same subject. Surely, as a service to the reader, the two sections can be merged into a unified article. -- Fplay 08:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)