Jamieson v HM Advocate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scots law This article is part of the series: Courts of Scotland

Administration Scottish Government Cabinet Secretary for Justice Judicial Appointments Board Scottish Court Service College of Justice Office of the Public Guardian Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission Scottish Prison Service

Civil courts Privy Council House of Lords Court of Session Lord President Lord Justice Clerk Lords of Session Office of the Accountant of Court Sheriff Court Sheriff

Criminal courts High Court of Justiciary Lord Justice-General Lord Justice Clerk Lords Commissioner of Justiciary Sheriff Court Sheriff Principal Sheriff District Court Justice of the Peace

Special courts Court of the Lord Lyon Lord Lyon King of Arms Scottish Children's Reporter Administration Children's Hearings Scottish Land Court Lands Tribunal for Scotland

Criminal justice Lord Advocate Crown Office Advocate Depute Procurator Fiscal

Advocates and solicitors Faculty of Advocates Advocate Law Society of Scotland Solicitor-Advocate Solicitor

Jamieson v HMA was a Scottish criminal case decided by the High Court of Justiciary on appeal, which held that a man does not commit rape where he honestly, albeit unreasonably, believes his victim is consenting.

The case is reported at 1994 SLT 537.