User talk:Jalaluk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Shajalal Qutub-Ud-din Ahmed Chowdhury
A tag has been placed on Shajalal Qutub-Ud-din Ahmed Chowdhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -ReuvenkT C 00:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Qutb-ud-din ahmed chowdhury. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 18:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Qutb-ud-din ahmed chowdhury. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 01:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Qutb-ud-din ahmed chowdhury, you will be blocked from editing. Jons63 (talk) 01:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk
[edit] Notability of Qutb-ud-din ahmed chowdhury
A tag has been placed on Qutb-ud-din ahmed chowdhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 01:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Qutb-ud-din ahmed chowdhury. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 02:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Qajar Qub Ud-Din Ahmed Chowdhury
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Qajar Qub Ud-Din Ahmed Chowdhury, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Qajar Qub Ud-Din Ahmed Chowdhury seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Qajar Qub Ud-Din Ahmed Chowdhury, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article as presently written is almost incomprehensible, and gives no indication as to what position this person held during the British Raj, or what his claim to notability might consist of. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
