Talk:Jagannath
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Question; is the name correct, as the Sanskrit form? I believe it is Jagannatha in Sanskrit, and should be written so here. Imc 18:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
I believe 'Jagannatha' is usually spelt as Jagannatha, but pro-nounced as Jagannath when spoken. Maybe spelling should be adjusted? GourangaUK 08:53, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
- That pronounciation is only in certain languages including Hindi, but not Sanskrit as originally spoken, and not some modern languages either. I know that many Hindi speakers say these names without the final full 'a', but it's the Hindi that has changed. There is a continuing problem in getting consistency in naming here, but the general trend has always been to use Sanskrit forms for religious subjects. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hinduism#Naming_and_Transliteration . Now if Jagannath was a name that originated in that form, say in the Hindi language, that would be different, but then we need to know the origin. I believe the name is old and from Sanskrit. Imc 16:49, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yes, Imc is absolutely correct on the Sanskrit-to-Hindi dropping of the final inherent 'a' (Juggernaut etymology). I believe the Sanskrit (and Hindi) spelling is जगन्नाथ (jagan-nāth). The question I have is, is there a local name for the deity, in Oriya or whatever the local dialect of Puri happens to be? Khirad 12:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- In line with Imc's comments above does everyone agree that the article should be moved to Jagannatha as this is the more appropriate spelling? We would have to request it, as a page already exists with that title. Gouranga(UK) 20:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
-
Categories: WikiProject Krishnaism articles | WikiProject Vaishnavism articles | Start-Class Hinduism articles | High-importance Hinduism articles | Start-Class Krishnaism articles | High-importance Krishnaism articles | Start-Class Vaishnavism articles | High-importance Vaishnavism articles | WikiProject Hinduism articles

