From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard. |
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
[edit] Still no indication of notability
Despite the fact that half a dozen people weighted to say "keep" in the deletion discussion, not a single one of them actually edited the article in any way-- it still fails to state any reason why the subject is notable, and thus the article still meets the written criteria for speedy delete (A7: "article does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.") I am frankly puzzled as to why people are thrilled to weigh in on the deletion discussion, but don't have any interest in making even a cursory edit on the article itself, not even to add the links that they went to the trouble of finding to post to the deletion discussion. So I edited the article to incorporate the links posted by Eastmain and Mind meal in the deletion discussion-- now there's at least a hint of some explanation of notability. While I was at it, I also deleted the statement of which languages this guy speaks. Speaking three languages does not make you notable. Geoffrey.landis (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
