User talk:J-melz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent J-melz (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Jeeks, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Marasmusine 17:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Jeeks

A tag has been placed on Jeeks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Marasmusine may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Jeeks, you will be blocked. Camaron1 | Chris 17:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Jeeks. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

For the Article Jeeks. Jeeks is a legitamite Frisbee Player and he actually was among four people who turned the game into a real sport. If you don't know anything about Frisbee please don't delete this page because a lot of other people know a lot about this man and i am surprised that this article hasnt been made in the pas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J-melz (talk • contribs)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Jeeks, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in Talk:Jeeks, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "also, i did not vandalize any pages i simply wanted to make a page and everyone ganged up on me this is completely absurd"

Decline reason: "You engaged in vandalism on other user pages. You repeatedly recreated an article in spite of warnings. Then you created another sock, Wikifreak99‎, to continue. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 18:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Yes, you did. You also created a sockpuppet to continue recreating your article. IrishGuy talk 18:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes because i thought that my article was blocked indefinitely, and creating a sockpuppet is no reason to label my account as one that vandalizes. J-melz 18:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "actually the reason why i repeadely recreated an article in spite of warnings was because i was not sure how to dispute someone who was deleting my page and i accidently delted the speedy deletions thing. Because i am new to wikipedia i was not sure how to do it, after 2 trys i realized what to do, it was all a mistake. And i never vandalized other users accounts, i dont even know how"

Decline reason: "Your contribution log is publicly available and shows you have vandalised other user pages. — Yamla 18:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "what i am saying is that how come someone who deleted my entire page is not persicuted however i make a jokingly edit and i am punished. this system is designed to keep people who are in power in power and make sure that new users get banned immediatly, i just want a real chance to prove myself"

Decline reason: "Talk page protected for unblock tag abuse. — Sandstein 19:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.