Talk:IWeb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] ripoff

can't someone add in the fact that iWeb is a complete ripoff of RapidWeaver? I would, but i'm sure the arrogant wiki overlords would revert my edit. 68.35.201.102 05:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't see any edits that were made by you reverted. --Mboverload 05:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
also, don't attack editors. The reason yu can't just put in that it's a ripoff of RapidWeaver is that it's POV. It's not a RapidWeaver ripoff. Plenty of WYSIWYG website makers exist, RapidWeaver wasn't the first. I prefer RapidWeaver myself.

WTF is this? This article reads like an advertisement. Is WP in the business of promoting the sale of software products? More evidence that WP is becoming less and less of an encyclopedia (if it ever was one) and more like everything2. Retconn 04:02, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

You are more than welcome to fix it. - mboverload

[edit] "alternatives"

I think the name alternatives is a bit POV. I'm changing it to "Other Mac WYSIWYG-type web publishers" -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 03:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discovery

This section is funny:

"Apple quickly reverted the page to its last good edit."

Sounds like some Wikipedian was a little over-zealous.

[edit] Markup

Shouldn't there be a section on iWeb's horrendous markup and disregard of semantics / web standards? 128.158.145.51 18:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

No, it doesn't actually affect its target audience at all. Web standards are great. CSS makes it infinitely easier to make style changes to static websites, but when dynamic tools like this come in to play some of those benefits disappear. The most important thing is absolutely that the page renders as intended in web browsers. I would also like to add that while CSS is wide spread enough to be considered a standard, things like xhtml are only Standard Proposals from groups which are just offering their input on how the web should work and are by no right of any authority to demand anything from developers of websites or browsing tools. And they don't. So why are you so loaded about the issue? And which particular standard proposals are you upset iWeb isn't supporting fully? --211.30.199.122 11:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] iWeb, the web hosting provider

Should someone add the fact that the iweb.com domain and the iWeb trademark in Canada and the US is owned by Groupe iWeb Inc. / iWeb / iWeb.com, a web hosting provider.

[edit] www.mm

fish at home is a gud plas —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.144.39 (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)