Talk:Ivan Cheparinov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-Importance on the importance scale.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Handshake controversy

I think the section on the handshake controversy is a bit biased towards Short, it makes it sound like Short was in the right when really it should just report what happened or both points of view. The opposing view (read the http://reports.chessdom.com/short-cheparinov-comments article in the references) would be that a) he refused to shake his hand twice b) short got up and went and found a referee to complain c) the referee incorrectly penalized d) but the penalty was overturned the next day because e) shaking hands is just a recommendation or guideline, not a rule —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inputable (talk • contribs) 22:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I slightly disagree with your version of events, especially with e). It is true that in their protest Cheparinov and Danailov claimed that the FIDE behavioural norms are no more than a recommendation (maybe we should add that this is what they say), but that was not the reason the Appeals Committee overruled the arbiter. They only changed the decision to declare the game a loss because "GM Cheparinov, after his initial refusal to shake hands with GM Short, didn’t clearly reject the arbiter’s request to do so" ([1]) and the behavioural norms say that arbiters should give players a second chance to shake hands ([2]). I did add a few words to the article to emphasize that the initial forfeit was overruled ([3]). David Šenek (talk) 11:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)