Talk:Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
WikiProject Central Asia Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet and Central Asian portions of Iran and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] Jamaot

This reference [1] (albeit appearntly biased) may shed some light on the relationship between Jamaot/JIG & IMU. AndrewRT - Talk 21:55, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

This article seems to consist mainly of disjointed single sentences. Can sombody either link them or flesh them out into full paragraphs? And also, we need to make up our minds on what the movement is called. The article starts by saying that it is now called the Islamic Movement of Turkestan, and Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan is an old name, but for the rest of the article it is called IMU.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. Andrewa 12:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

Islamic Movement of TurkestanIslamic Movement of Uzbekistan — Originally I moved it to IMT from IMU, now I changed my mind. The name this organization goes by continues to mystify and perplex me. At times they refer to themselves as the Islamic Movement of Central Asia. News outlets almost always call them the IMU. The Uzbek Gov calls them the IMT, and the Russian Gov calls them the "Islamic Party." I'm going with the press. KazakhPol 21:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

[edit] Survey - Support votes

[edit] Survey - Oppose votes

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] responsible use of tags

Somebody keeps applying the {{NPOV}} tag to this article — but without initiating a discussion here on the talk page, where they offer an explanation of their concern. The {{NPOV}} tag, like many other related tags, tells readers to look to the talk page for a discussion of why the article has been tagged.

We aren't mindreaders. We shouldn't have to guess as to why another wikipedian has tagged an article.

I agree with KazakhPohl here, the repeated application of tags, without fulfilling the obligation to explain their reasoning, is indistinguishable from vandalism.

I have written about this, in more detail, here.

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 20:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)