User talk:IrzamAhmad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Malta appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Bit Lordy (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User talk:Bit Lordy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Razorflame Report false positives 22:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Malta. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Razorflame Report false positives 22:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cool it

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Malta. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Porterjoh (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

How have I done anything wrong?!


I know Malta has some Arabic influence, but you cannot prove that Malta wants to become Arab/Muslim again. And there's no such thing as an "Arabic climate." Academic Challenger (talk) 22:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Malta IS arabic! Arabic influence? Malta likes to pretend its european, but it's Arabic really! So stop with the lies!

Note your use of subjective phrases like "likes to pretend" and "it's Arabic really". Making claims at odds with what has already been written, and using charged ("lies"), vague ("it's Arabic"), and undefined ("pretend") language that can't even be evaluated, will accomplish nothing but create confusion, anger, and disarray. Wikipedia isn't about chest-beating and bullying and staging nationalistic feuds, it's about producing quality, objective, fact-based articles. —Largo Plazo (talk) 00:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Such things as this are also referred to as POV-pushing. Stop. Porterjoh (talk) 22:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Malta. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- lucasbfr talk 22:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

And this kind of language WON'T be tolerated here either. Either you keep cool and remain civil with the other editors, or you will be blocked. -- lucasbfr talk 22:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

But they are lying! Malta is an Arab, not an Italy!!!


WHY HAVE I BEEN BLOCKED?!

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This edit [1] is quite enough... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 22:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am sorry, I was not told that it was wrong until afterwards, by Lucasbfr . I was actually writing a nicer worded comment on the page when you blocked me. I appologize. Now that the rules have been explained, I will abide by them, and I will not swear. Can you please unblock me?"

Decline reason: "You may make your comment when the block expires. — Nakon 22:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please can I be unblocked now? I just wanted to do good. I won't be able to edit for another week if I don't go on tonight. I did the unblock request, so how come I am being rejected?"

Decline reason: "Your comments just prior to the block make it seem very unlikely you were in the middle of "drafting a polite comment." I'd suggest reading though our policies and calming down a bit. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Unblock?

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Yes, that was before I was informed I could be blocked for being rude, at which point, I stopped. If you have noticed, I am not swearing or doing anything now. Please, please unblock me. Surely as a new user, you should be helping me, not punishing me?"

Decline reason: "We expect a certain common sense from all editors. Don't start again once your block expires; thanks. — Sandstein (talk) 23:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Since I blocked, I will not decline this unblock request, but leave it up to another admin. And seriously, you could not have honestly believed that this comment [2] would be allowable in any situation. Additionally, your editing history is filled with attempts to force your own point of view on an article, to the point of disruption, for which you were also warned. Good day. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 23:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Maltese language

This string of edits to Talk:Maltese language has some unacceptable parts. I understand that you're passionate about the issue, but keep in mind these things

  1. Do not accuse other editors of being dishonest (i.e. "trying to lie"). It is considered an assumption of bad faith, which we are against (see our policy of assume good faith). If you believe other editors are advocating incorrect information, explain calmly why you believe it is incorrect. Also see our policy on civility.
  2. If you feel that another editor is acting in an inconsiderate manner, try to ignore such objectionality. Saying "I'm insulted by this" makes for heightened tension in the talk page. In this case, it seems you are insulted by incorrect material, and being insulted by incorrect material won't get you very far here. Try to remain cool.
  3. If you'd like to make a case for changes, try to be more objective. Simply saying "Languages such as Arabic should be included" or "all the Arabic letters should be included on this page" need to be qualified with explanation to be convincing to other editors. Keep in mind that when you make statements like "More of the vocabulary is Arabic" and "Arabic was official first" you might need to back it up with a source.
  4. please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) (there is also a little icon you can click above the edit box) this way we know who said what.

I'm sure that, as you continue to learn Wikipedia's rules, these rules won't be too difficult for you to follow. Regards. — Ƶ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 23:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)