Talk:Interstate 805
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Topics |  Interstate Highways  California State Highways |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments) |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force. |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Southern California, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Southern California, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. | ||
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject California. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
Contents |
[edit] Wikiproject
This is the first interstate (to my knowledge) that has been added to the wikiproject... I'll note things that need to be fixed. --Rschen7754 23:47, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
Yuck! It looks really bad. I had to move the I-805 sign to the left (which I believe is against wikipedia policy) to get things to look half decent. Also the I-5 box is obscured by the routebox... yuck! (although that will probably be fixed when I add more content). I'll create a redirect so that CASR 780 links to I-780 so the links will work... and some of the images don't work either. Well, it's a start. --Rschen7754 00:04, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- I'll fix the images tongiht. atanamir 03:27, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
It's getting better... but it still is a mess! The state law section goes under the routebox. If there was some history info then the state law section would get pushed down... but I don't know anything about the history of this highway. --Rschen7754 03:43, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
- if you want, you can put a { { - } } (without the spaces), it will put it under. --atanamir 04:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pictures
rschen, do you think you can get any pictures of this to post up? Its a personal preference, but i like posting one picture for each of the ca/srs =) atanamir 12:09, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
- I do not have any that I have taken at the moment; however there is always the possibility, considering that I do live in Southern California. However, I do have some for CA-241, 91, 79, and I-5, I-15 and 215... I haven't gotten around to uploading them yet. --Rschen7754 02:23, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Classification
Does this page still need to be a stub? --Rschen7754 02:57, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Accuracy of dates
Was it really approved as a chargeable interstate before its legislation was passed? I'm deleting the words soon after for now to remove the apparent chronological contradiction. - Pharaonic 09:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Control Cities
On the CA-52 connector to SB I-805, the control cities are listed as "National City/Chula Vista" . . . now, I don't know if it would be appropriate to change the Control Ciy listing here, because those control cities technically are never shown on the actual mainline freeway. Could someone clarify if control cities listed at junctions "count"?
