Talk:International Surrey Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Surrey Company article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling. WikiProject Cycling is an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Initial article text

This article looks very much like it was written by a company representative. If so please read WP:COI and comply with the policy when making future edits. The policy requires that company representatives declare themselves as such here on the talkpage and then post suggested amendments here so other editors can insert them into the article or not.

Also please keep in mind that the article will be edited by other editors to produce a neutral encyclopedia article, even if the company doesn't necessarily agree with the results. - Ahunt (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright Violations

I have removed the entire history section, since it was lifted, word for word, from the Company website. The history of the company can be re-written using that page as a ref, but it has to be written in the editor's own words to avoid a WP:COPYVIO. - Ahunt (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I have now re-written the history section to avoid any copyright violations. - Ahunt (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
The removed "What is a Surrey Bike/Bicycle?" [1] section was also a copyright violation copied word-for-word from FAQs. - Ahunt (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Advert tag

User:Gillyweed quite rightly tagged this article as reading like an advertisement, as it looked just like Corp spam. I have re-written it to remove the corp spam, copyright violations and NPOV and have removed the "advert tag". There is much more work that can be done to turn this into a quality article, help from other editors would be appreciated! - Ahunt (talk) 12:37, 5 March 2008 (UTC)