Talk:International MaxxPro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.


[edit] Engine

The engine in the MaxxPro is not a MaxxForce engine. Those were renamed for the 07 emissions, the MaxxPro does not use these engines. I'm not sure but I believe it a DT 408

According to Navistar themselves it's a MaxxForce engine.[1] This may be partially a marketing exercise as I imagine that the commercial MaxxForce engines if they meet 07 emissions requirements will probably not run on poor quality mil-spec fuel. However, as MaxxForce is a Navistar brand name, if Navistar say it's a MaxxForce engine then it's a MaxxForce engine. Dino246 08:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
On further checking, Navistar rebranded all their engines MaxxForce. The name doesn't refer to any particular engine or family of engines, it's an umbrella brand for all Navistar engines (other than those used by Ford which are branded PowerStroke). The MaxxPro uses a Navistar built engine, ergo it has a MaxxForce engine. Dino246 08:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok that makes sense. The pre 07 engines are used in limited markets (military and export) and I was hoping to find horsepower/torque specs. It's just a matter of determining which one it is.

Their own website is surprisingly devoid of information on the MaxxPro. The similar sized 7000-MV with which it appears to share a bonnet (hood) and which was the basis of MaxxPro's predecessor, the APC, uses the DT 466 engine.[2]

[edit] Photograph

This article could do with a photograph. I've seen a few different ones knocking about the internet which all seem to be promotional photos from either International or Plasan Sasa. I'm not familiar enough with the Wiki policy on image submission - is it acceptable to upload a company's promotional photograph as "fair use"? Dino246 12:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

yes. use the tag "promotional". it is on International's IMG website banner, but not available as a standalone picture as far as I know. Haven't seen any Plasan Sasa pics, but who knows? DID has pics on their site. Dunno where they got em.
Tmaull 03:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I must have labelled something wrongly because the photo I put up got deleted. Can someone with more experience here upload one of the many Navistar/Plasan sourced publicity photos that are knocking around. Dino246 07:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Finally found a photo of the Cat1 vehicle on Flickr[3] with a CC license so I uploaded it and linked it. Confirms what I maintained that the Cat1 has one less side window and the photo in the infobox is a Cat2 MaxxPro (despite the filename). Dino246 09:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MRAP Cat 1 navistar.jpg

Image:MRAP Cat 1 navistar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)