Talk:Intellipool Network Monitor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on October 26, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Computer networking, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Computer networking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article is on a subject of mid priority within Computer networking for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
Computer networking To-do:
|
||
[edit] Notability
- Google search on "Intellipool":
592unique hits
-
-
- comment * I think you are misstaken [1] 73.700 hits currently —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.115.158.58 (talk) 13:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- This IP is registered to Intellipool and has only been used for Intellipool-related edits. --A. B. (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Google News search on "Intellipool": one press release
- Google News Archive search on "Intellipool": 27 hits but most look like recycled press releases (many aren't in English, so I can't tell for sure).
--A. B. (talk) 20:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- Just a suggestion, since the deletion here apparently is based on whats in or not in Googles index, you, or someone familiar with the subject, should review what it scores in relevant keywords, that should be a far better "notability" metric consider Google's now famous "page rank" algorithm. buran 21:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- During the AfD (just closed as keep), the following reference was posted from a "reliable source" (per the Notability Guideline):
- Sistek, Sakib, Small but competent network monitor, "Nätverk & Kommunikation" (an IDG publication), January 2004. Retrieved 5 November 2007.
- --A. B. (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- During the AfD (just closed as keep), the following reference was posted from a "reliable source" (per the Notability Guideline):
- Just a suggestion, since the deletion here apparently is based on whats in or not in Googles index, you, or someone familiar with the subject, should review what it scores in relevant keywords, that should be a far better "notability" metric consider Google's now famous "page rank" algorithm. buran 21:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
