Intermediate value theorem
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In Mathematical analysis, the intermediate value theorem is either of two theorems of which an account is given below.
Contents |
[edit] Intermediate value theorem
The intermediate value theorem states the following: If y=f(x) is continuous on [a,b], and N is a number between f(a) and f(b), then there is a c ∈ [a,b] such that f(c) = N.
Suppose that I is an interval [a,b] in the real numbers R and that
is a continuous function. Then the image set
is also an interval, and either it contains [f(a),f(b)], or it contains [f(b),f(a)]; that is,
,
or
.
It is frequently stated in the following equivalent form: Suppose that
is continuous and that u is a real number satisfying f(a) < u < f(b) or f(a) > u > f(b). Then for some c ∈ [a,b], f(c) = u.
This captures an intuitive property of continuous functions: given f continuous on [1,2], if f(1) = 3 and f(2) = 5 then f must be equal to 4 somewhere between 1 and 2. It represents the idea that the graph of a continuous function on a closed interval can be drawn without lifting your pencil from the paper.
The theorem depends on the completeness of the real numbers. It is false for the rational numbers Q. For example, the function f(x) = x^2 - 2, x ∈ Q satisfies
. However there is no rational number
such that
.
[edit] Proof
We shall prove the first case
; the second is similar.
Let
. Then
is non-empty (since
) and bounded above by
. Hence by the completeness property of the real numbers, the supremum
exists. We claim that
.
Suppose first that
. Then
, so there is a
such that
whenever
, since
is continuous. But then
whenever
(i.e.
for
in
). Thus
is an upper bound for
, a contradiction since we assumed that
was the least upper bound and
.
Suppose next that
. Again, by continuity, there is a
such that
whenever
. Then
for
in
and there are numbers
greater than
for which
, again a contradiction to the definition of
.
We deduce that
as stated.
[edit] History
For
above, the statement is also known as Bolzano's theorem; this theorem was first stated by Bernard Bolzano (1781–1848), together with a proof which used techniques which were especially rigorous for their time but which are now regarded as non-rigorous.
[edit] Generalization
The intermediate value theorem can be seen as a consequence of the following two statements from topology:
- If
and
are topological spaces,
is continuous, and
is connected, then
is connected. - A subset of
is connected if and only if it is an interval.
The intermediate value theorem generalizes in a natural way: Suppose that X is a connected topological space and (Y, < ) is a totally ordered set equipped with the order topology, and let
be a continuous map. If a and b are two points of X and r is a point of Y lying between a and b with respect to <, then there exists
such that
. The original theorem is recovered by noting that
is connected and that its natural topology is the order topology.
[edit] Example of use in proof
The theorem is rarely applied with concrete values; instead, it gives some characterization of continuous functions. For example, let
for
continuous over the real numbers. Also, let
be bounded (above and below). Then we can say
at least once. To see this, consider the following:
Since
is bounded, we can pick
and
. Clearly
and
. If
is continuous, then
is also continuous. Since
is continuous, we can apply the intermediate value theorem and state that
must take on the value of 0 somewhere between
and
. This result proves that any continuous bounded function must cross the function,
.
[edit] Converse is false
Suppose
is a real-valued function defined on some interval
, and for every two elements
and
in
and
such that
. Does
have to be continuous? The answer is no; the converse of the intermediate value theorem fails. As an example, take the function
for
, and
. This function is not continuous as the limit when
gets close to 0 does not exist; yet the function has the above intermediate value property. Another, more complicated example is given by the Conway base 13 function.
Historically, this intermediate value property has been suggested as a definition for continuity of real-valued functions; this definition was not adopted.
Darboux's theorem states that all functions that result from the differentiation of some other function on some interval have the intermediate value property (even though they need not be continuous).
[edit] Implications of theorem in real world
The theorem implies that on any great circle around the world, the temperature, pressure, elevation, carbon dioxide concentration, or anything else that varies continuously, there will always exist two antipodal points that share the same value for that variable.
Proof: Take
to be any continuous function on a circle. Draw a line through the center of the circle, intersecting it at two opposite points
and
. Let
be the difference
. If the line is rotated 180 degrees, the value
will be obtained instead. Due to the intermediate value theorem there must be some intermediate rotation angle for which
, and as a consequence
at this angle.
This is a special case of a more general result called the Borsuk–Ulam theorem.
The theorem also underpins the explanation of why rotating a wobbly table will bring it to stability (subject to certain easily-met constraints).[1]
[edit] Intermediate value theorem of integration
The intermediate value theorem of integration is derived from the mean value theorem and states:
If
is a continuous function on some interval
, then the signed area under the function on that interval is equal to the length of the interval
multiplied by some function value
such that
. I.e.,
[edit] Intermediate value theorem of derivatives
If
is a differentiable real-valued function on
, then the (first order) derivative
has the intermediate value property, though
might not be continuous.
[edit] References
[edit] External links
- Intermediate value Theorem - Bolzano Theorem at cut-the-knot
- Bolzano's Theorem by Julio Cesar de la Yncera, The Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
- Eric W. Weisstein, Bolzano's Theorem at MathWorld.



