Talk:Information Engineering
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Ad
This article reads too much like an advertisement.
- This is fairly accurate of IE and the role that various individuals (e.g., Martin, Finklestein) played in the evolution. Having been involved in the roll-out of IE, and knowing Jim, I think its close and certainly not advertisement.
-
- Advertisements don't usually talk about the "chequered history" of an idea or product, and don't discuss the parting of the ways between the founders. In comparison with many other articles in Wikipedia, especially technology, this article is pretty restrained in its claims on behalf of the benefits of Information Engineering. I believe it would be reasonable to remove the advertisement tag, but as I am a former employee of James Martin Associates and former technology champion for Information engineering it would probably be inappropriate for me to remove it myself. However, I agree that the article could be improved. --RichardVeryard 15:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] History unclear
"After 1980 the Finkelstein thread evolved into the DP-driven variant of IE."
Nowhere in the article does it explain what DP expands to.
192.43.65.245 16:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
This is a history of IE and, knowing James Martin and others involved, is actually close to reality. It is not advertising but factual.
[edit] Want to discuss Modeling to the Code Level
We are currently modeling information from the business into the proces and code level. Anyone else doing this? --Kyndra Morris 14:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. Look at the Wikipedia articles on Computer-aided software engineering (CASE), Model-driven architecture (MDA) and Software factory. --RichardVeryard 15:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Real term ?
Here in Canada, I think Information Engineering is called "Information Technology Engineering" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.208.130 (talk) 13:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
