Talk:Inflorescence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Photo identity
I will be glad if someone can identify the species of this inflorescence Image:Inflorescence 1.jpg and put it. thanks. --vineeth 17:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like Euphorbia pulcherrima (Poinsettia) - Marshman 18:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yes it is, when i saw the picture of the bush , Image:Poinsettia_bush_belize.jpg i could identify it. I am not a biologist but very sure that the appearance of bush is same :) --vineeth 18:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inaccurate article
This article is very inaccurate.
- Determinate/indeterminate: Explain better
- Raceme: Should come before corymb
- Cyme: Explain types
- Head: It can also be determinate. Other inflorescences, like the cyathium (not mentoned!) are pseudanthia.
- Spadex: Is a kind of spike
- Ament and catkin are the same thing
- Solitary: is not an inflorescence
- The poinsettia has a corymb of cyathia, not florets
- Many, many other things
Please, improve this article. Aelwyn 08:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Some questions
Hi! I have some questions. This article has been completely re-written recently.
- Don't you think articles like panicle, raceme, umbel, pedicel are now unuseful?
- Do you think that cone doesn't belong here?
- Should spadix ad catkin be listed in the 'Other' section and have their own for a more in-depth description, just like cyathium?
- Is there a name in english for the spike-like inflorescence of Mentha longifolia (italian: spicastro, german: Scheinähre)
- Do you think that the thyrse comes conceptually before the panicle?
- Another name for Other section? Maybe 'Specialised inflorescences'?
- Assessment? Still at Start level?
Aelwyn 12:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Question
This page refers to "definite" inflorescences. Should that read "determinate"? Nadiatalent (talk) 18:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

