User talk:IndependentConservative

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not an abuser of multiple accounts. This is my ONLY and FIRST account with Wikipedia. So I am not a sock puppet. I am not a meat puppet either. If my account were working I may have already made contributions to other content. I was making contributions before a user ID was required on Wikipedia. I am not Yidisheryid and should not be blocked simply because I happened to agree with them regarding some pages, that decisions have already been made on. That debate is over, some of those pages are no more, but I've been blocked from contributing to anything else on Wikipedia, because of a false accusation. I requested a CHECK USER be run and from reviewing the discussion over my being blocked, I never see that as ever being done. I volunteered and still will send a copy of my drivers license or cable Internet bill, to prove I am not Yidisheryid, if requested. In the discussions Yidisheryid also volunteered to forward similar information if requested of them. Sure Yidisheryid and I have some similar interest and we also have some dissimilar interests. I can't contribute to anything while blocked. I feel more should have been done to allow me to prove myself before simply blocking my account. I hope in the future a majority of administrators will have to approve a block before implementing one. One administrator believed I was some kind of sock/meat puppet and my account is blocked. It seems other administrators were not equally convinced. Just because 2 people agree on something should not be just cause to block someone. I am my own unique person. I am TRYING to contribute to other pages that someone like Yidisheryid would never spend time reading, because those pages are about matters that likely do not interest them. My account should be unblocked. One person made a false accusation about me and I the innocent party having to deal with the inconveniences of being proposed for a block, then actually being blocked and now appealing for my account's full restoration. It really makes no sense that I must endure this, but my false accuser has been able to get away with convincing someone to block my account. Will my false accuser even face any repercussions for all this trouble they caused me? It seems the only judgment made in my regard is that I posted to some articles someone else posted to ALTHOUGH WE DID NOT BOTH POST TO ALL THE SAME ARTICLES, there are things I contributed to that Yidisheryid did not and vice versa. No CHECK USER run, no attempts made to contact me to discuss anything at all. I am the innocent party, but have endured the treatment of a wrong doer and have not even had a Wikipedia account very long. Please unblock my account. And please take measures to prevent innocent people from having to endure things like this when false accusations are made.IndependentConservative 02:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "A brand new user somehow knows how the AfD process works, but makes a beeline straight for it as his/her first edit? Obvious sockpupptery. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 08:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.