Talk:INA trials

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Indian history workgroup.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

I've heard that many of the soldiers in the INA claimed they had been forced to serve in it during the trials, can anybody lend any confirmation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.52.215.67 (talk) 18:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Fay's book says that the prosecution alleged that the INA forcibly recruited by using torture and strong arms tzctics down to firing at the PoWs in camps. They used as witness a person whose name I cant remember now, but he recieved a George crocc later. His account is also in Hugh Toye's springing tiger. But Fay 's argument is that the firing were isolated incidents, although some strong tactics may have been used intially for the First INA, but not in the scale or scope alleged by prosecution. He also refutes and disproves the story of the George cross awardee.Rueben lys 18:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)