Talk:Implementation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am interested in success coaching and training, and talk about 'implementation' as meaning 'putting into action what you know needs to be done'. For example, if you buy a training program on marketing, you want to implement what you learn or you've wasted your money. The word 'implementation' has an IT connection. What definition would you put on 'implementation' as I mean it?

68.163.48.92 (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I noticed alot about the implementation hasnt been done :/

[edit] Enable https?

--68.112.161.61 20:50, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)How do you enable HTTPS on your computer. I have a HTTPS:// address, and I ca't reach the server, how do you get around this?

I do not. But were I to attempt to do so I would likely look first at my http server to see whether it has https capabilities, and whether they require cumbersome manual manipulation to generate keys and such or autogenerate them for me. My multinational might then also question whether I ought to use a key that has an internationally respected authority instead of one made up by my https server or one made up by myself.

Nowadays, as far as I am aware, one can merely instruct one's https-capable https-server to turn on https for one or more or less domains or subdomains and 'it is so, subject to the buglessness of the implementation'.

OK, enough about that, on to what I came to this tawk page to tawk about. ;)

(Note the implicit 'sugggestion' that we consider using the label 'tawk' instead of 'talk' when there exist potential ambiguities between formenes, sonemes, phonemes, etc; ("that is, when write is distinguishable from utter and/or/etc see is distinguishable from hear"??? is hearing to do with here-ing and herd-ing?)

Knotwork 00:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] All politics is divided into three parts? ;)

The Implementation page stated: " his process consists of rule-making, rule- administration and rule-adjudication. Factors impacting implementation include the legislative intent, the administrative capacity of the implementing bureaucracy, interest group activity and op "

Is it true that political implementation is a system having only three funcs, those being make{R}. administer(R), and adjuducate(R) ?

Is R the radius, the radians, the 'trigger-no-metric' function? As in, the "new angle", wherein each particular is "new" as compared to all existing particulars?

Make(R) presumably is the generator of the objects of the category 'political' ? Or, in functional programming, maybe it is the generator of the functions rather than of the objects?

Polling particulars in order to arrive at an explicitation of an explication of politics might explain why polling is sometimes considered a pollitical thing to do? Does polling contract to poling, like it would in G. Spencer Brown's laws of form?

Knotwork 00:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

hola! i am a big slut and love guys and if you want to hook up my number 28887645