User talk:Idg101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Idg101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Also, please consider joining the Penn State WikiProject to help improve our coverage of Penn State topics. Thanks! GChriss <always listening><c> 18:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image:The_Phyrst_Hydrant.jpg

Thanks for asking Mr. Arnold whether you could use Image:The_Phyrst_Hydrant.jpg. However, the image license is incompatible with Wikipedia policy, and the image has been deleted. If you can get him to release the copyright to it into the public domain, it will then be appropriate for use, but, as of now, the license is not acceptable. See also Wikipedia:media copyright questions. Picaroon 01:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia, for legal reasons, can only accept images that are tagged in a certain way. The tag you used chose when you uploaded said non-commercial use only, so I, in accordance with the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion policy, deleted it. Images uploaded to Wikipedia, with rare exceptions, must be usable by all - and that includes commercial enterprises. The page Wikipedia:Images explains this in more depth. Picaroon 02:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Phyrst

I restored the redirect to State College, Pennsylvania as a result of the AfD debate here. If you wish to have the decision overturned, you need to submit a request for a deletion review through the process outlined on that page. Thanks! — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Never mind, I did a bit of checking and found precent supporting an editorial overturn of a redirect decision here. I've restored the article. My apologies and happy editing! — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure what "deletion lists" you're referring to. The deletion discussion at the page you linked will remain as a record of the discussion that occurred regarding the notability of the article. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 16:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Please do not modify conversations that have completed as a result of an AfD discussion, as you recently did with The Phyrst. If you feel you have improved the article satisfactorily, no further discussion needs to take place on the deletion discussion page, which is intended to be preserved according to the notice places by the closing admin. Additionally, do not remove talk page banners that indicate previous discussion related to the article, as you did on the talk page for The Phyrst. Preserving links to previous discussion is essential in identifying ways the article can be produced, and it is counterproductive to remove them. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 02:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy Nomination

A tag has been placed on Zeno's Pub, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jehochman (Talk/Contrib) 20:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of All American Rathskeller

An editor has nominated All American Rathskeller, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All American Rathskeller and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:55, 14 April 2007 (UTC)