Talk:IAC/InterActiveCorp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Expedia Spinoff

I deleted references to IAC travel since those have spun-off into Expedia. For reference:

If there's a better way to show that these are no longer part of IAC, edit away... --Tiffanicita 22:23, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] history of IAC?

There's a remarkable dearth of history on IAC; anybody able to help out? --moof 21:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question on the Barry Diller section

In looking at other corporations/conglomerates it would seem that the entry on Barry Diller here is out of place. I'm not sure if it should be removed. Opinions? Adiamas (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Remove it; anything to remove the peacock tail is welcome here. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing external links

I have removed this extensive set of external links that do not seem to meet the expectations of WP:EL and do not seem to functioning for WP:V. Jeepday (talk) 22:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[Removed the SPAMs from here, see the history of the page for the details 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jeepday (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree those were useless. Excellent. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 02:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
My larger concern is the citations. I'm going to nominate this article for deletion if sources are not found before the COI report I just added on behalf of the anon above clears. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 04:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)