User talk:I Q('.'Q I
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Regarding your edits to Afro:
Your recent edit to Afro (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 15:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Afro. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dina 15:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 68.111.92.229 18:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George VI of the United Kingdom, you will be blocked from editing. LibLord 16:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Afro, you will be blocked from editing. Dfrg.msc 23:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on The Emo Oranges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eggishorn 18:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Nicolaus Copernicus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

