User talk:I'M TEH REAL NUMBER ONE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent I'M TEH REAL NUMBER ONE (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Massachusetts. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Seattle, Washington, you will be blocked from editing. —slakr\ talk / 12:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Seattle, Washington, you will be blocked from editing. Wildthing61476 (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chicago Cubs‎, you will be blocked from editing. SWik78 (talk) 12:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Vermont, you will be blocked from editing. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Parsecboy (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Other people got more chances than me. I only made four changes, most people make five before their banned. Please, you have to give me one more chance. I love you."

Decline reason: "You do not appear to show an interest in productive editing. By the way, we can block you on the first vandalism— 4 is simply being generous. — slakr\ talk / 13:04, 3 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I've been unblocked, but I can't edit yet. I just need someone to let me edit again."

Decline reason: "You have not been unblocked. You created the unblock message yourself. Go away. — Pedro :  Chat  13:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Come on, you really have to give me credit for trying to make humor. After all, it was sort of the truth. I am now ready to take Wikipedia seriously and only write information I have cited. I sincerely apologize for my disruptive edits."

Decline reason: "Your editing history and fake unblocks right here show this is simply not the case. — Yamla (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.